Freedom is getting a new leader

[Tom]

After Tasker was PK'd Goose felt as though it was a Dick move, so Goose was willing to wave the PK if Tasker stepped down, Tasker will remain in the faction and remain alive. The question is who gets it? Co-Lead, or the War-dog. Votes are to be placed in the poll and in your ost include who you voted for and why.

[Chrono]

I voted on  goose, He is a cool guy and i think he is a good leader and he is the co-leader..i think he should be the new freedom leader.

[Mrtasker]

I voted for Tom, because in my eyes he thinks about his actions before he does them. Faction leaders need to take all the angles of the situation into account, and in my opinion Goose rarely does this. As an example this PK buisness, it was entirely for OOC reasons and was very badly thought out. No offence to Goose. But I just think Tom will do a better job.

[Nargotah]

Goose, you know I love you bro, (no homo), but I just can't really see you leading that well. Of course, this is only if my opinion even matters that much at this point, considering my inactivity.

[N3gativezero]

Goose is a helluva good fighter, but Im kinda doubting his leadership a bit. He seems like a bit too much of a machiavellian(sp?) to be in control of Freedom, who are supposedly laid back and fun-loving (This is bullshit on SRP).

[emperor bobby]

Tom, Reasons Stated Above. Goose Thinks with His heart, Someoen pisses him off, he does something, regardless of wether that is the best action for the faction at the time, Just my 2 cents though.

[Mangoman]

Tom, he has a more mature personality, and can do more for the faction , due to his admin-ness. But ontop of that, he seems more laid back, like a freedomer should.

[Ravanger]

Well I am kind of in the middle of all of it I am not really sure who to vote. Tom is a good admin, leader and other things. Goose is active and is basicly the co-leader so it would be like him stepping up. hrmm....

[Zen]

Goose, he is a good roleplayer and i can see him leading Freedom to an ultimate victory.

[Pawx]

I voted for Tom, I trust Tom and watched him Roleplay alot, I know he can lead Freedom as well...

Goose is a Fine Roleplayer of course, and Active. But, He has a Down Side, he is not a great Leader. His rules him and Sharock made are nearing Freedom into a Military Faction. I don't want Freedom to end up being hated and turning into a Ghost Town because of Goose and Sharock, I want a Great Leader, Someone Mature, Someone that know's what Freedom really is about, I want Tom.

[Cutch]

I don't know what you people have been smoking but the reason Freedom is an apparent "ghost town" is because o'brian ditched us as our trader. Also, shouldn't votes be left to actual freedomers?

[Ravanger]

Cutch does have a point^.

[Pawx]

shouldn't votes be left to actual freedomers?

The Decision for everyone to vote for the Freedom Leader was picked by Tom, If you have a problem with it, complain to him.

[Red_Khezu]

While Goose is a good roleplayer, a good fighter and is next in line for command i must go with Tom. Goose did (as far as i know) use OOC reasons to PK Tasker, and his key supporter, Sharock, makes us stand around like military men and I did not join freedom to stand around yelling at stalkers all day like i did in the military. I support Tom because he does promote a friendly atmosphere (unlike Goose as far as i know, prove me wrong.) is also a good roleplayer, and fighting ability wont hold the faction together.

[Sharrock]

I'm voting for goose, As tom does not even follow orders. He is nothing but drama and HS RP.

[Duranblackraven]

I'm voting for goose, As tom does not even follow orders. He is nothing but drama and HS RP.

NC - Dying of Laughter


Yeah, I vote Tom.

[Celtic]

As ex-Freedom leader I will be giving one of the candidates my blessing.

So Bto has my blessing.

[Rebel6609]

Im stuck in the middle aswell. Both are experienced and would make great canidates... so... I don't know.

[Dude]

Goose is a good combat leader I don't know why people keep saying hes a bad leader, the only truthful downside is he doesn't exactly give off the Freedom aura.

[Goose]

I played the role of combat leader because we needed one obviously Seth was not one, or a great one, no offense but I did that because freedom would be all Teddy bears and unicorns

[Mrtasker]

If teddy bears and unicorns is another way of saying, trying to get the best roleplay out of every situation. Then sure.

[Goose]

For those of you saying I was the one to organize the entire ok I was the one who killed him getvyour faqs straight as it was sharrock and cutch who had the idea then spent 30 mins icly AND oocly trying to convince me, so if you are going to go ahead and pin that on me, blow it out your ass, as you may be able to tell I am rather pissed off at multiple thongs right now, so fuck off.

[Dude]

I played the role of combat leader because we needed one obviously Seth was not one, or a great one, no offense but I did that because freedom would be all Teddy bears and unicorns

Bro, I know that, I voted for you.....

[N3gativezero]

I really don't see how a faction, wielding assault-rifles 'n' such and living in the zone, could be considered "Teddy bears and unicorns" under any circumstance.

[Dude]

If your taking that literally, then please smack yourself, Goose means we were doing next to nothing, just sitting in our base being nice to every single person that entered our base and not taking any actions against Duty, or the Military.