I have no info at the moment but here's some eye candy..nomnomnom.
(https://forums.hypergamer.net/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawkerassets.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F9%2F2010%2F03%2Fcrysis21.jpg&hash=afed0326ca146101a75270f251340fd490fc0e18)
(https://forums.hypergamer.net/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawkerassets.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F9%2F2010%2F03%2F500x_crysis22.jpg&hash=d930858fbaf444d37a7940e5c94f82430003748b)
(https://forums.hypergamer.net/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.expreview.com%2Fimg%2Fnews%2F080116%2Fcrysis_2-s.jpg&hash=ef1d8a798c38e7a5b3db3a3222a4f56111634a2d)
(https://forums.hypergamer.net/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fve3dmedia.ign.com%2Fimages%2F02%2F04%2F20432_592.jpg&hash=83857149b29a0c4dea6dde31f34e027919ddaf99)
Last one is taken IRL.
Nope, all in-game.
I'm sorry but I lol'd.
I guess, they just boosted the graphics, and about the Story, Gameplay Experience, nothing.
Crysis was indeed one of the most, if not the most graphically enhanced and demanding game of its year. I agree the story was really, really, REALLY blah. The beginning was decent, once you started the alien crap, goodbye already shaky storyline. Crysis 2 will, without any doubt, be running the single most powerful graphics engine known to the gaming world. But the big question is, can they fix the goddamn story this time and make it enjoyable? As much as I like sprinting 15 yards in 2 seconds and then punching some guy dead and sending his body flying back 10 feet, it doesn't keep me entertained for long. I think the only thing that did is, oh hey here it comes again, the graphics. Multiplayer was pretty good however. People sneaking around, hiding in bushes, and blowing you and your partners face off in one gauss rifle shot was fairly epic. They have a good thing going, it just needs some depth.
I agree, I enjoyed the Multiplayer more then the Singleplay. Tho, the Aliens are pretty epic.
They boosted everything lol
Quote from: Dark Angel on 05-03-2010
Last one is taken IRL.
Nope its ingame screeny
Should be an interesting play, i guess.
It looks really cool.
Sigh.. Looks like I need to update mah ATI card.
Hey guys, it's Graphics: The Game 2.
It looks like real life in the last photo, nice.
(https://forums.hypergamer.net/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_u-8jsnr-IjE%2FSbbkoehtZkI%2FAAAAAAAACzw%2FJ8UDXGq-yAs%2Fs400%2Fdo_want.jpg&hash=9096c4e421d01cf6725c8bcd877565f18f6851ed)
Looks awesome
The only reason they made it New York is because it is less demanding on consoles then say a forest :P. So they had to edit the story line for the sake of the consoles.
Not sure how this will run on consoles ... I mean they had to dumb down MW2 for it to run on the consoles.
Quote from: ㅎㅎLocke on 29-03-2010
Not sure how this will run on consoles ... I mean they had to dumb down MW2 for it to run on the consoles.
It takes less resources to make a City then it does a vibrant jungle or tropical setting.
Quote from: Wellington on 03-04-2010
Quote from: Cobra on 13-03-2010
The only reason they made it New York is because it is less demanding on consoles then say a forest :P. So they had to edit the story line for the sake of the consoles.
Hmmm interesting idea, but of course in the end they'd probably just sacrifice the resolution to crap then upconvert that crap to 1080p like they did with COD4 and MW2.
Like they should, as consoles are inferior.
I hope they dont make it for console, dumb it down, and then port it to PC.
Don't worry guys I develope mods for the original crysis and Cryengine 3(what Crysis 2 is running on) has a built in feature that makes all of versions of the game the same and its being made for pc's on a pc then they mess with the graphical settings on the consoles and thats it. The CEO of Crytek himself said its not being dumbed for pc and it will once again push the limits of any good PC! In short its a pc game ported to consoles!