Change Map Vote

[Dug]

Redemption is tiring me a bit, I think most of you are getting tired of it.
Either way I've put up a vote to change map in hope that Exile will see it and change it to what the crowd wants.

[Gokiller]

Sector 42. Bandits have no where to hide on Redemption and it would be nice to have a BIG map

[Knife_cz]

Yeah..

[Dug]

Honestly I'd like a bigger map, redemption, I just feel boxed in. Chernobyl or S42 would do it for me.

[Silence)]

Sector 42

[Dug]

Main reason we need a big map is because of the playerbased factions.

[whyku]

I agree, the 42 map looks great. So why did we change.

[Khorn]

We changed cause the player base was dwindling. S42 is nice and all, but with the size, it can get a bit empty. Especially since back then, most factions hid in their base.

[Dug]

We have more and more playerbased groups, that's why I suggest a large map. Faction wars would be possible between them.
Which should make jobs or roleplay rain upon the server.

[Khorn]

Are any of the factions willing to fight for land?

And do the factions have the man power to control outposts?

[Dug]

Are any of the factions willing to fight for land?

And do the factions have the man power to control outposts?

If you look at The Haven and Grey March, then yes.

[Mrtasker]

I vote for Chernobyl, i've had alot of good memories on that map.

[Paintcheck]

If you look at The Haven and Grey March, then yes.

Your job is to fight Freedom more than it is to stomp on small player based groups.

I think we need more players to move back to 42 or anything else. It would be nice if we had a mid size map that was bigger than Redemption (or the same size as redemption, just without the choke points) but smaller than Chernobyl or Sector 42. Redemption effectively kills faction fighting due to the chokepoints making it impossible for an attacking faction to survive, but the other maps are so huge that with the 10/40 players things will feel absolutely deserted.

[Bielecki]

I might start playing a little more if it goes back to Chernobyl. Like Mrtasker said, lots of good memories on that map.

[meetdadoom]

Chernobyl, had tons of great memories.

[Tom]

Chernobyl, had tons of great memories.

^^

M. Bison "Yes Yes!" Widescreen HD reupload

I loved the Chernobly map.

[Turkey]

I agree, the 42 map looks great. So why did we change.

You did not exist in HGN when we used it so It' a -LONG- story

[lolKieck]

S42. It wasn't as boring and linear as redemption, and not as empty as Chernobyl.

[meetdadoom]

Lol sad part is Silver is making the new S42 linear like Redemption XD

[Fry]

I vote we should stay on Redemption.
If we change back to Chernobyl, It will be desolate and lonely when factions aren't on. Chernobyl did have great memories, but it was oh so very lonely when only a few people were on. On redemption, when there are just a couple of people on roleplay is still going on regardless.

[Ravanger]

Redemption as Chernobyl is still crashie in my mind.

[Knife_cz]

Good memories on chernobyl ye,but on S42..more place for events(underground) and..its bigger..and not as empty as chernobyl..come on S42 is nicer..:-(

[Khorn]

With the Monolith gone for now, I still think the underground will be off limits. Plus, the vent system is a bitch to use to get to the lower levels. I like S42, but last time we had it, everyone hid in bases. I'm still undecided on my vote.

[Joemoma]

Honestly I'd like a bigger map, redemption, I just feel boxed in. Chernobyl or S42 would do it for me.

I second this, but I believe S42 would work out better, due to the whole "Emissions" thing only having protection in actual bases means if you're out wandering and an emission hits with no warning and the only base nearby is an enemy, you're basically fucked, and I prefer S42 for it's size and realism, it has a place for everyone.

[Maxi96203]

I SHAME the 7 people that wanted to stay on redemption