Loader
↑ ↓

HyperGaming Network

C.S.R.P. - ROSTER ADDED

Started by Dvs!lverwing, 23-02-2010

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions
24-02-2010 #25
+support

If you don't support this, you're probably a COMMUNIST.
24-02-2010 #26 Last Edit: 24-02-2010 by Zakhar
+support


He's saying this will be run by a few ex-clear sky members and recruits, loners so it's not just a lolclearsky faction It's obvious he's put some effort into thinking it all out.
STALKER RP Characters
                 
Alive- Mental Stability= 92%- Michael Zutherson-DUTY Applicant

Alive- Mental Stability= 99%- Nikolai Zakhar-Mercenary
24-02-2010 #27
Well +support and good luck mate.
25-02-2010 #28
+support
I must say, bravo on thinking a correct storyline that didn't stray away from canon. While this has been tried and failed, I believe that with proper leadership it can succeed. Please, prove me right, Silverwing.

"Stop living life so that you can do a job with out pay"
-Blake/Last Exile
25-02-2010 #29
Am trying as best as I can. Sent messages to all of the faction leaders, waiting on their response for whether they'd like to be marked as Neutral, Hostile, of Friendly. At the moment I'm willing to try and keep a friendly status with anyone I can. Mercs will start as neutral, Bandits will more than likely start at hostile, due to the fact in CS they were constantly fighting with The Renegades, a Bandit group, and Loners will be marked as Friendly. Monolith will start as Hostile as well, I suppose.
During the course of the last fiscal year minimum wealth was earned, and dismal tears were shed for critical health concerns.
25-02-2010 #30
Denied Clearsky are disbanded and are no longer around, however some members are still around, i would settle for some "recommended" "authorised" members roleplaying as former clearsky members, but that's about it.

Quotebreslau: if i cant cheat i dont wanna play
breslau: period
25-02-2010 #31 Last Edit: 25-02-2010 by Dvs!lverwing
Did you not read the thread? Seriously? It honestly seems like you saw the group name and denied it. If you had given a fuck to read the back story, you'd know there are almost no Clear Sky in the group at all. It's a group of Loners led by 3 Ex-Clear Sky picking up where Clear Sky has left their research off. I can not see the harm in 3 Ex-Clear Sky members being in the group, considering the fact they were Ex-Clear Sky means nothing, really. The fact they are Ex-Clear Sky doesn't even matter, they are doing the same thing the Loners in the group are doing, and that is picking up where Clear Sky left off. Your reason for denying is amazingly half-assed and it really seems like you do not give a fuck.
During the course of the last fiscal year minimum wealth was earned, and dismal tears were shed for critical health concerns.
25-02-2010 #32
+Support
I don't see why, This isn't Clear Sky faction, Just one that have the same objectives, and also they seem to be active.
25-02-2010 #33
Quote from: Aresty on 25-02-2010
+Support
I don't see why, This isn't Clear Sky faction, Just one that have the same objectives, and also they seem to be active.

It's too late, already denied for a ridiculous reason that I provided proof against time and time again.
During the course of the last fiscal year minimum wealth was earned, and dismal tears were shed for critical health concerns.
25-02-2010 #34
Maybe you should have thought about naming it something else.
No need to rage like a fag... its not going to get denied without being looked into first.
25-02-2010 #35 Last Edit: 25-02-2010 by Dvs!lverwing
Quote from: The Jackal on 25-02-2010
Maybe you should have thought about naming it something else.
No need to rage like a fag... its not going to get denied without being looked into first.

I'm not raging "like a fag", and I'd appreciate it if you weren't so blatantly homophobic, thanks. If he would have read the thread, he wouldn't have put "Clearsky are disbanded and are no longer around, however some members are still around" As that is the point I was getting at for half of the thread. I worked within the limitations the lore AND the server has given, yet I was still denied, and that is absolute bullshit. And if you're going to deny something with a stupid reason such as due to its name, you shouldn't have the power to deny it in the first place. And the fact he is going to make it so it needs to be authorized to have your characters back story involving membership in Clear Sky is bullshit as well, considering I could make my back story to involve Military membership with no problem at all, no authorization, nothing.
During the course of the last fiscal year minimum wealth was earned, and dismal tears were shed for critical health concerns.
25-02-2010 #36 Last Edit: 25-02-2010 by OccAZNion
Quote from: The Jackal on 25-02-2010
Maybe you should have thought about naming it something else.

Quoting SilverWing:
"I could replace the words "Clear Sky" with something like "Dark Bears" or something like that and you'd more than likely have no problem with it."

Smooth..


Well what's done is done..
Shall locking be called to order?
Vasily Ivanov - MIA
25-02-2010 #37
Quote from: Dvs!lverwing on 25-02-2010
Canon factions? That's what you people go on about, but the truth is, Ecologists are a Canon group, Military is a Canon group, Freedom is a Canon group, DUTY is a Canon group, Monolith is a Canon group, Loners are a Canon group, Bandits are a Canon group, Mercs are a Canon group, yet you somehow allow them.

He needs to go play the actual games if he cannot understand the lore of stalker properly enough to start a major faction from the game before SOC.

Locked, as said before no one is allowed to make a canon faction, Clear Sky is disbanded in SOC and COP, and we are just before SOC happens.

Quotebreslau: if i cant cheat i dont wanna play
breslau: period
25-02-2010 #38
I declareth that this Locke hath failed.
User actions
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2