Friendly bloodsuckers?

[KillSlim]

I'm sure you have seen one or more 'friendly' bloodsuckers on the S.t.a.l.k.e.r. RP server.
Personally I think it's a little stupid, but I know my personal opinion will do completely nothing which is why I've started this thread and call for attention to this issue.
If you've played either of the S.t.a.l.k.e.r. games you know that there aren't any friendly mutants that aren't bugged. The fact of a Bloodsucker having the ability to talk to Humans, create friendships and just generally not 'Do their role' in this server seems a little silly to go unnoticed.
***
Remember in S.t.a.l.k.e.r. Shadow of Chernobyl when you first encounter a bloodsucker? I certainly do, and I remembered just how atmospheric and horrifying the situation was. Of-course, my mind was still young and imaginative, naturally I would have been a lot more scared playing this game alone and in the dark, with headphones. The point is, the second the Bloodsucker see's you it let's out horrific call and charges towards you. Wouldn't this soil the pants of anyone (ICly.)? The Bloodsucker's appearance is just 'nighmarish', but when it's invisible and charging towards you, it's much worse for the victim.
But imagine this. The Bloodsucker runs towards you, stops, doesn't attack, stares at you and says 'Hi.' This has actually happened to me, when it did for the first time I wondered what the f was going on.

Again, getting to the point of this post.
Friendly bloodsuckers are just un-canon to the S.t.a.l.k.e.r. RP scenario. I can probably see a single bloodsucker being taught not to attack through ways of torture, but capturing one would be near-impossible.
Anyway, I'm suggesting that friendly bloodsuckers are 'abolished', banned in the server. It's completely unrealistic to the scenario of S.t.a.l.k.e.r. I'm aware that it may cancel out some forms of roleplay but it will resume the Bloodsucker's main 'function' of RP and will allow other forms of RP to be created.

[Renegade]

+Support Its cool to be that close to a Bloodsucker and not dead and all but seriously ...the fuck

[Rook]

You make quite a good point, a bloodsucker hurling at you screaming its face off making you turn your white boxers brown and then stopping to say hi would be very un-realistic to the game scenario, but if the sucker had a more "subtle approach" such as i have encountered one "brushing past you in a small hallway and going invisable before you can actually notice its one or it appearing behind a guy and when he moves it goes invisable again, that kind of friendly/observative  appearances would make it more justifying to its nature and still scare the crap out of you and your friend when you yell "holy shit theres a sucker behind you!" I think most people will find this agree-able which keeps it there and can be used for events, i cannot think of one at this moment but i am sure creative admins could put this idea to good use.

[~Ness~]

Well, that's how I met my friendly neighborhood Bloodsucker.

[Cobra]

I support it is frustrating to see friendly suckers but it's still okay to keep them in captivity :V Like in a cage or something.

[HockeyMaster195]

I pretty much give any 'friendly' bloodsuckers one warning and then kick them.

[Silver Knight]

I pretty much give any 'friendly' bloodsuckers one warning and then kick them.

Amen, i think ill add this into the rules, the only way you can probably get away with this, is if the bloodsucker is captive (has a muzzle, chained up maybe) But bloodsuckers are animals who would do nothing than to kill humans, due to them feeding off their blood.

Humans = Bloodsuckers Food.

[jack9304]

Well i think same about that In the stalker shadow of chernobyl and clear sky i really got scared about bloodsuckers and i wold be happy if theres a new rule wich says that they Must attack and can be shootet on sight (when not invisible)

Sorry for my bad english i think you know me ^^

[Devster]

Shooting on sight doesn't really work too well if you want to roleplay, also cloak not working 100% of the time can be another problem

[Assassinator]

Who's to say that they are full bloodsucker and are still contain a mental connection with their human mind? What if they are not exactly a bloodsucker but they look like one?

Edit: I do not a have friendly bloodsucker. Mine will eat your face. Omnomnomnomnom

[Paintcheck]

On a side note has it ever really been confirmed that all suckers were mutated humans?

I kind of like the "friendly" suckers. I think talking is going way too far but I think what Lesbian does with Minerva is acceptable as that sucker isn't emotional or anything, it's just curious and investigative.

Personally though the players who play the suckers right (as in going invisible, following you out to the middle of nowhere and then screaming and owning your face) have scared me in real life before. The only problem I have with them is when I'm trying to go somewhere/RP with someone and they just walk over and start mauling me when I don't really want to be sucker fucked at that moment.

[Locke]

Minerva roleplays well as a friendly sucker, I think that it should be allowed as long as they don't nuzzle with STALKERS

[jaik]

I SUPPORT THIS THREAD IN 100%

FRIENDLY SUCKERS = RETARDED

I abused caps lock.

[Dark Angel]

I would like to disagree as canonly there are friendly bloodsuckers.

If i find the right chapter i can translate the part  when 2 ecos discussed it.

1. Bloodsucker is natural mutation of humanoid usually caused by an emission.
2. Like in the book ECOs caputred stalker who got hit by emission and starts mutating , they followed every step of mutation and found out that if you interrupt standart mutation or treat mutating spiecmen chances of it keeping humanish thinking rises upto 45%. (From the book)
3. Also there are human made suckers same as controllers , they are usually much more clever than natural ones.
4. There was a way to control them by shock and so on. Because when human mutates into sucker yes , they halfly become animals , and every animal can be trained.

I can add much more points but well it's not needed.

[KillSlim]

I see where you're going 19Years, how about we strictly limit the number of friendly bloodsuckers, roster them; because at the moment we have more friendly bloodsuckers than hostile ones.

[~Ness~]

Lol, not really. I've only seen one, Minerva.

[itsjustguy]

Minerva is a epic roleplayer for the friendly bloodsucker.I disagree with banning friendly

[Dark Angel]

I see where you're going 19Years, how about we strictly limit the number of friendly bloodsuckers, roster them; because at the moment we have more friendly bloodsuckers than hostile ones.

Support this.

Yeah if 50% of bloodsuckers are going to be friendly then why not to say "Hey lets all live together?"

[Tunddruff]

You see the thing is, when you think friendly bloodsucker you think of my British Bloodsucker who talks.

You cant say you dont.

19, rps as a Bloodsucker that is passive and doesnt talk giving face motions and is happy aslong as she is full... Tenel knows that... Dx

[Ravanger]

I say Minerva keeps playing as a friendly Bloodsucker I mean Lesbian roleplays Minerva very well.

But I say limit the number to friendlys. I mean who would want like 20 happy nice bloodsuckers.

I mean atleast 2 or 3 would be good, 2 actually

[Deet]

They were fine at first but it's not a challenge anymore.

We really need some hostile suckers.

[Ravanger]

We have alot of hostile bloodsuckers they only really friendly one I seen is Minerva.....Well long time ago I did see one that was a pet and stuff. But all the pet stuff is bullshit.

[SteveCiprioni]

If you feed them enough and save them from evil duty bloodsucker abusers then i dont see the problem with them following you around but them talking is going to far

[Dark Angel]

OLD THREAD STOP BUMPS!

[Commissar Nitro]

Your sig is herasy YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TO MUCH ALCAMAHOL

and your never happy........oh wait thats my fault........


Ummm hi!